top of page

What you're really asking for (even when you don't know it)

  • anabaldas2002
  • 3 days ago
  • 3 min read

Updated: 1 day ago

Something happened this week that I haven't been able to stop turning over in my mind.

I was preparing to meet a potential new client — someone accomplished by any measure. Years of meaningful work, serious credentials, a career that has already outpaced most people's lifetime ambitions. She arrived with three clear, practical concerns: not enough feedback from her team, priorities that felt misaligned with what her organisation expected, and a frustrating inability to read what success actually looked like in her role.

Reasonable. Logical. Actionable.

And also, I realised, completely beside the point.


Eye-level view of a serene landscape with a winding path

Something happened this week that I haven't been able to stop turning over in my mind.

I was preparing to meet a potential new client — someone accomplished by any measure. Years of meaningful work, serious credentials, a career that has already outpaced most people's lifetime ambitions. She arrived with three clear, practical concerns: not enough feedback from her team, priorities that felt misaligned with what her organisation expected, and a frustrating inability to read what success actually looked like in her role.

Reasonable. Logical. Actionable.

And also, I realised, completely beside the point.

When I sat with what she'd shared — really sat with it — I noticed that every one of those three presenting problems was a different way of asking the same, older, more vulnerable question: Am I seen here? Am I valued? Do I belong?

That is not a feedback problem. That is the oldest question in the human repertoire, dressed up in a very polished suit.

Here is what I have come to believe, from years in the coaching room and from my own inner work: high-achievers are extraordinarily skilled at translating emotional questions into strategic ones. We do it because it feels safer. Strategy is actionable. Strategy has steps. Strategy doesn't require us to say I'm scared, or I don't know if I'm enough — admissions that feel dangerous when you've spent years being the competent one in every room.

So we ask for better feedback systems when we really want reassurance. We optimise our schedules when what we need is to know our work matters. We read books on leadership when the real, unspoken question is: do I actually belong in this room at all?

The problem is never the strategy. Strategy is useful. The problem is when strategy becomes a way of avoiding the real conversation — first with ourselves, and then with the people around us.

And here is what I'd call the great irony of ambition: the most capable, accomplished people I know are often the ones carrying the heaviest unspoken question about whether they are genuinely good enough. Not because they are broken. But because that level of drive almost always comes from somewhere. And when the external scaffolding shifts — new role, new chapter, new version of the life you're building — the old question shakes loose.

The leaders who become truly transformational are rarely the ones who get better at strategy alone. They are the ones who learn to hear the question beneath the question — in themselves, and in the people they lead. When a team member comes to you with a process problem, what are they actually asking? When a colleague pushes back on your idea, what are they trying to protect? This is where emotional intelligence stops being a concept on a leadership framework slide and starts becoming a lived practice — one that asks you to be honest about your own unspoken questions first.



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page